Julianna Yau’s blog

Because I need to feed the geek in me.

 

Next Department of Culture Meeting this Saturday

The next Department of Culture meeting is this Saturday, September 13 from 10am to noon at The Theatre Centre (1087 Queen St. West) in Toronto. The meeting is to organize swing teams for the Oakville and Oshawa ridings.

Facebook event here.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration
By Julianna Yau
On September 11, 2008
At 5:56 am
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Cultural Trade Advisory Team - Media Release

Media Release
Cultural Trade Advisory Team (CTAT)
Executive Board

St-Albert, 22 August 2008

Following the termination of the PromArt program by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the termination of the Trade Routes program by the Department of Canadian Heritage as well as announced cuts to various other programs benefiting the Arts Industry, the Private Sector Co-Chair of the Cultural Trade Advisory Team, Menno Plukker, has issued this statement.

“Since 2000 the private sector of the Canadian Cultural Industries have been engaged in a dialogue with the government through the Cultural Trade Advisory Team (CTAT), formerly known as Trade Team Canada – Cultural Goods and Services (TTC-CGS), and originally as the Cultural Trade Advisory Board. This dialogue has allowed Cultural Industries to advise the Department of Canadian Heritage and other funding bodies on how to increase Canada’s cultural trade.

Together, the Chairs of the working groups for each sector of the Cultural Industries, express dismay and disbelief that the Canadian government has decided to terminate the PromArt and Trade Routes contribution programs as of March 31, 2009. This unilateral decision clearly contradicts the government’s stated desire that the public and private sectors should work together in order to make more efficient use of the limited resources available to the Cultural Industries, given that no consultation took place prior to the cuts.

Throughout the history of Canada, the government has worked as an investment partner to practically every Canadian industrial sector, from agriculture to aerospace, with the understanding that that investment protects jobs and encourages growth by exporting Canadian goods and services around the world. The economic importance of Canada’s cultural industries makes them worthy of this kind of economic partnership.

According to a study by Statistics Canada released in 2007, the Canadian Arts and Cultural Sector contributed $43.2 billion to the Canadian economy, represented 4% of the national employment and accounted for 3.8% of the Gross Domestic Product (statistics for the year 2003). In 2005 (according to the same study) exports of Cultural Goods amounted to $2.37 billion and Cultural Services to $2.90 billion. These numbers have grown over the last few years, in part because of the continued investment by the Canadian government in Cultural Industries through funding programs such as PromArt and the Trade Routes contribution program. Through these funding programs, small investments have offered substantial returns of increased revenue from export activity. Increased trade revenue in turn makes cultural industries less dependent on Canadian government subsidies. In short, investment in culture is a good business decision for the government. With the help of these programmes to open the necessary doors, Canadian artists are critically acclaimed and commercially successful around the world. Furthermore, they demonstrate the variety and diversity of Canadian culture to our trading partners, fostering greater understanding.

The few examples of some of the grant recipients that have been mentioned in the media do not alone demonstrate the enormous scope of the cultural activity which benefits from programs such as Trade Routes and PromArt – in the Performing Arts, Crafts, Design, Film and Television, New Media, Publishing, Sound Recording and Visual Arts.

In the sector of the Performing Arts, beneficiaries of the programs in question have been major orchestras, ballet companies and some of the most renowned and prestigious artists in the field of theatre and dance. Export support programs have enabled Canadian book publishers to achieve an average annual growth rate of 15% for their total export sales since 1993. Over the history of the trade programme at the Western Canadian Music Awards, 29 Canadian artists have been signed to foreign labels, 45 artists have been booked to tour internationally, 40 have been booked to showcase internationally, 344 have been booked for international festivals, and 34 have had their music licensed in foreign territories. The list of successful investments is too long to itemise here in full. Without investment by the government in cultural trade, our ability to expand markets abroad and increase audiences and buyers will be severely compromised.

Our confidence in our working relationship with the Canadian government is shaken. However, we are prepared to enter into a new conversation with the government in order to ensure that our priorities and needs are known, and to find solutions to counter this ill-considered development.
We look forward to a renewed dialogue with the Government of Canada, via the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. ”

For further information:
Menno Plukker - Menno Plukker Theatre Agent, Inc. menno@mennoplukker.com
Tom McFall - Alberta Craft Council tmcfall@albertacraft.ab.ca
Carol Outram - Canadian Aboriginal Design Council outram@videotron.ca
Suzanne Bosse - Association for the Export of Canadian Books sbosse@aecb.org
Jean Bureau - Incendo Productions jbureau@incendomedia.com
Catharine Saxberg - Canadian Music Publishers Association csaxberg@musicpublishing.ca
James Lewis - Canadian Interactive Alliance james@ciaic.ca
Patricia Feheley - Feheley Fine Arts art@feheleyfinearts.com

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration
By Julianna Yau
On September 1, 2008
At 6:33 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Check my numbers

Update: See the Canadian Conference of the Arts’ breakdown of the cuts, which are more accurate than the chart below.

I’m doing some prep work for my letter to my MP et al regarding the recent cuts to arts funding. Anyone out there willing to check my numbers for me? The chart I put together isn’t getting to the $40-million or $44-million number being quoted, even by the article from which I pulled the numbers (which quotes $44.8-million).

Also, The Globe & Mail indicates that the cut to Trade Routes is a $7.13m cut, while others (Canadian Conference of the Arts, DOC and CBC) indicate it’s $9m.

Grant/Program Financial impact Financial impact Discontinued
PromArt -$4,700,000.00 -$4,700,000.00 x
Canadian Memory Fund -$11,700,000.00 -$11,700,000.00 x
Culture.ca -$3,800,000.00 -$3,800,000.00 x
Canadian Cultural Observatory -$560,000.00 -$560,000.00 x
Canadian Culture Online -$5,640,000.00 -$5,640,000.00 x
Northern Distribution Program -$2,100,000.00 -$2,100,000.00 x
Book Publishing Industry Development Program -$1,000,000.00 -$1,000,000.00
Canada Magazine Fund -$500,000.00 -$500,000.00
Audio-Visual Trust Fund -$300,000.00 -$300,000.00
Canadian Independent Film and Video Fund -$1,500,000.00 -$1,500,000.00
National Training Program for the Film and Video Sector -$2,500,000.00 -$2,500,000.00 x
Trade Routes -$7,130,000.00 -$9,000,000.00 x
Stabilization Project and Capacity Building -$3,400,000.00 -$3,400,000.00 x
Sustainability program -$500,000.00 -$500,000.00 x
Totals -$45,330,000.00 -$47,200,000.00 10

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration
By Julianna Yau
On August 23, 2008
At 5:34 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Faceless for a day

In response to the recent arts funding cuts, a Facebook group and event is being organized to stage a one-day online protest on September 15 (the first day of Parliament). This has been initiated by Keith Barker in association with Native Earth Performing Arts.

From the Facebook group:

This is a roll call to all people who believe that Arts and Culture is a part of their lives and is important outside of the political spectrum. This is for artists, families, parents, friends, co-workers, relatives, enemies, neighbors, acquaintances, to all people who enjoy the arts and culture of this country and feel that it must be nurtured and cultivated. We need to send out a message to our politicians to let them know that there are more of us than they think and congruently that we are not going to vote for any person or party that plans to cut funding to arts and culture in the impending election. This is for all of us; people from all sides of the political landscape. This is not about what party you belong to, but how you feel about arts and culture in this country.

So on Monday September 15th (the first day of Parliament) we want you to do one thing. It’s very simple. It will only take a small amount of your time. About the same amount of time it will take to cast your vote for the candidate you feel best represents what you want.

This is it: We would like you to leave your profile picture blank for the day. Use your faceless profile picture as a symbol of the loss of identity Canadians will experience if funding to the arts is cut.

Be a catalyst for change and put your best face forward on election day, but on Monday September 15th leave it blank and send a message so that we can count how many people have joined the fight.

I encourage netizens to not only leave their Facebook profile blank, but any other social networking site. It’s only one day, and you can exercise your creativity afterwards with a new profile picture!

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration, social networking
By Julianna Yau
On August 20, 2008
At 8:02 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Art Associations on the budget cuts

Filed under : arts administration
By Julianna Yau
On August 19, 2008
At 8:12 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Government’s newest game: cutting arts funding

Over the past few days, the reports of cuts to government funding for the arts has been alarming. This is after passing the Status of the Artist legislation, wherein:

The Government of Canada hereby recognizes
(a) the importance of the contribution of artists to the cultural, social, economic and political enrichment of Canada;
(b) the importance to Canadian society of conferring on artists a status that reflects their primary role in developing and enhancing Canada’s artistic and cultural life, and in sustaining Canada’s quality of life;
(c) the role of the artist, in particular to express the diverse nature of the Canadian way of life and the individual and collective aspirations of Canadians;
(d) that artistic creativity is the engine for the growth and prosperity of dynamic cultural industries in Canada; and
(e) the importance to artists that they be compensated for the use of their works, including the public lending of them.

The recent funding cuts have impacted the following programs:

  • The Stabilization Projects - Stabilization Components - provides grants to Stabilization Projects. A Stabilization Project is administered by an independent non-profit group that represents the interests of the larger community through the make-up of its Board and through the diversity of its revenue base. Funding from this component is added to that raised by the Stabilization Project from other levels of government and the private sector. This broad revenue base in turn funds eligible arts and/or heritage organizations within a specific geographic area that are willing to undergo fundamental changes related to how they plan, organize, finance and govern themselves; to be closed April, 2009
  • The Stabilization Projects - Capacity Building Components - provides contributions to arts and heritage organizations that do not benefit from participation in a Stabilization Project. For example, there will always be places in Canada where, due to smaller populations, it is impractical to establish a Stabilization Project. Also, Stabilization Projects may establish eligibility criteria which limit the participation of some organizations. The Capacity Building Component ensures a Canadian scope for the program by providing financial support through direct contributions to those arts and heritage organizations which want to undertake projects to improve their organizational capacity, but do not have access to a Stabilization Project; to be shut down in 2010.
  • A-V Presentation Trust - dedicated to increasing Canadians’ awareness of their rich and distinctive heritage in moving images and sound; ending its annual contributions of $300,000
  • Canadian Independent Film and Video Fund - private sector funding body which supports non-theatrical film, videos and new media projects created by Canadian independent producers to enable lifelong learning; ending its annual contributions of $1.5-million
  • National Training Program in the Film and Video Sector - to foster the professional development of emerging Canadian creators and to renew the skills of professional Canadian creators to ensure a healthy and thriving film and video industry that Canadian audiences can benefit from now and in the future; ending its annual contributions of $2.5-million, with the program to be discontinued April 1, 2009
  • Trade Routes - program helps profit and not-for-profit organizations in the arts and cultural sector prepare to export and sell in international markets; the Government of Canada will stop financing contributions under the Trade Routes program at the end of this fiscal year, March 31, 2009
  • PromArt - grant program provides funding to Canadian artists and arts organizations for the promotion of Canadian culture abroad, in alignment with Canada’s foreign policy and trade priorities; grant to be ended March 31, 2009

And there is no shortage of coverage on these appalling cuts:

Between these budget cuts and the rediculous things happening with copyright legislation, I can’t help but feel abandoned by my government as an artist.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration
By Julianna Yau
On August 18, 2008
At 9:03 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Brief thoughts on C-61

I’ve been quiet on this blog for a while because I’ve been returning my focus to the production of new work. After selling all but one of the sculptures I completed last year, and one of the two I completed since, I need to replenish my supply of sculptures so that I can take care of the traditional tasks of compiling a portfolio and seeking representation and/or shows.

I have also moved all of my feeds from Akregator (which was randomly marking new feed items as read) to Google Reader so I can better control the amount of time I’m spending on trying to maintain something resembling a pristine inbox.

This break from the online conversation about copyright, technology and the other things that strike my interest was what I needed to be able to read C-61 with a fresh mind. I have not yet read any of the responses by the usual suspects, although I can imagine what they are. I doubt that any of my online peers are happy with C-61, and I’m mostly upset at myself for believing that it could be anything less than distasteful.

C-61 is obviously meant to help corporate rights-holders, and not consumers or the artists themselves. It reads more like a supplementary user guide for how you can technically use works than a set of guiding principles on the rights relating to acceptable usage of works. If the revisions in C-61 are made as they stand now, the Copyright Act will become more obscure and quickly obsolete than it is already. It shows a fundamental failure to understand either what the creators and consumers want and, more importantly, what is needed from a document which governs the rights relating to the use of works.

I’m not going to bother with an in-depth analysis of C-61, because I’m sure the blogosphere is already overflowing with those. Mostly, I am balking at how overly specific the wording is and that the legislators don’t understand technology, internet culture, creators, users or the creative arts industries.

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Filed under : arts administration, copyright
By Julianna Yau
On June 18, 2008
At 8:05 am
Comments : 2
Print This Post Print This Post