Julianna Yau’s blog

Because I need to feed the geek in me.

 

Blog Reading Catch-Up: Part 1 of Many

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On July 8, 2008
At 6:09 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Why Copyright?

A question which has been chasing me for a while is “Why are you interested in copyright?”. This question has been met with much humming, hawing and unsatisfactory gibberish from me. I suspect that I have been trying to answer the question too literally, and I’m never quite sure what kind of information is being sought by it. Do people want to know why I find copyright to be a fascinating academic pursuit? Or do they want to know my position on copyright as a stakeholder? Or is the information I provide to them up to me?

Perhaps one of the main issues is I find it difficult to explain my fascination with copyright law, or law in general… or why I my hobbies involve not scrapbooking but copyright legislation. Perhaps it’s something as simple as my enjoyment of a complex intellectual puzzle. After all, copyright involves law, philosophy, business models, creative output, and now politics and technological advancement. Explaining my delight in such a delicious piece of intellectual candy is a feat unto itself, and I know that “copyright is complex and I like that” isn’t the revelatory response which will satisfy myself or my inquirer.

Trying to provide a succinct and articulate summary of my position on copyright… what I want copyright law to do for me as a creator and a reader/listener/viewer is difficult, but I suspect more possible. The challenge with this is my multiple-role as an individual creator, an enjoyer of other creative works, a supporter of technological advancement (who believes tools are what we make of them) and an active member of various artists’ groups which represent a myriad of artists working with different media, business models and concepts on what copyright should and shouldn’t do for them.

Before we can do anything, what I think we need (and what I want) is to get some agreement on what needs to be done. One may think that’s an obvious first step, but it feels like we’ve gone around in circles before stopping to do that. The blog and events like CopyCamp have been good for facilitating these discussions, but it’s always difficult to get all of the stakeholders involved. Even some of those who are big stakeholders and have strong opinions may not always be involved, whether it be a scheduling conflict or a discomfort with the core group which manifests through social connections.

I strongly believe in two things:
1. Everyone’s needs can be met (particularly creators’ reuse of other creators’ work).
2. The only way that can happen is to be open to everything being a possible target for change.

Too often, we allow ourselves to limit our view on what can be changed. One of the roadblocks we constantly hit is how difficult it is to get clearance/licensing of a work to be appropriated (or simply included in a larger work, e.g. a song in a movie). This single difficulty is the cause of many creators feeling that they should not be required to compensate other creators for use of their work. Typically (but not always), creators who creatively reuse works do not have a philosophical problem with crediting, by name and/or with money, the creator (sic; specifically and not always the right holder) whose work they are reusing. So rather than deciding that what needs to change is the infrastructure (or lack thereof) for clearance/licensing of a work, they simply look at changing the scope and intent of copyright law. This type of tunnel-vision is wholly perplexing to me, even knowing that the ideal solution is not always entirely possible. Should we not be starting with the most ideal solution and making the necessary adjustments to it for practical reasons, rather than starting with an imperfect proposal which is riddled with compromises?

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On April 30, 2008
At 8:02 am
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Ang Lee speaks out against C-10

Ang Lee joins the chorus against the potential for censorship being created by C-10.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On April 22, 2008
At 7:04 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Judge Dismisses Mail Fraud Case Against Bio-Artist Kurtz

This came through my Facebook inbox yesterday, but I’m horrendously behind on blogging and reading blogs, so it’s already hit the major media outlets. It’s good to know they came to their senses!


A process that has taken nearly four years may be coming to an end. On Monday, April 21, Federal Judge Richard J. Arcara ruled to dismiss the indictment against University at Buffalo Professor of Visual Studies Dr. Steven Kurtz.

In June 2004, Professor Kurtz was charged with two counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud stemming from an exchange of $256 worth of harmless bacteria with Dr. Robert Ferrell, Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.

Dr. Kurtz planned to use the bacteria in an educational art exhibit about biotechnology with his award-winning art and theater collective, Critical Art Ensemble.

Professor Kurtz’ lawyer, Paul Cambria, said that his client was “pleased and relieved that this ordeal may be coming to an end.”

The prosecution has the right to appeal this dismissal. How the prosecution will proceed is unknown at this time. If an appeal were undertaken the case would move to the New York Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City.

Lucia Sommer, Coordinator of the CAE Defense Fund, which raises funds for Kurtz’ legal defense, said, “We are all grateful that after reviewing this case, Judge Arcara took appropriate action.” She added that “this decision is further testament to our original statements that Dr. Kurtz is completely innocent and never should have been charged in the first place.”

BACKGROUND ON DR. STEVEN KURTZ AND CRITICAL ART ENSEMBLE

Critical Art Ensemble (which Kurtz co-founded in 1987 with Steven Barnes) has won numerous awards for its bio-art, including the prestigious 2007 Andy Warhol Foundation Wynn Kramarsky Freedom of Artistic Expression Grant, honoring more than two decades of distinguished work. The group has been commissioned to exhibit and perform in many of the world’s cultural institutions—including the London Museum of Natural History; The ICA, London; the Whitney Museum and the New Museum in NYC; the Corcoran Museum of Art in Washington, DC; Schirn Kunsthalle, Frankfurt; Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris; der Volksbüne, Berlin; ZKM, Karlsruhe; El Matadero, Madrid; Museum of Contemporary Art, Helsinki; Museo de Arte Carrilo Gil, Mexico City and many more.

For more information about the case, please visit: caedefensefund.org

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On
At 6:55 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Intermission

I’m a bit under the weather this week, so I won’t be blogging unless it’s some sort of conference-related announcement.

A preview of some of the things to come:

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On April 1, 2008
At 6:43 am
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Technical difficulties all over the place…

My web host upgraded to php5 last night, so I’m struggling to stabilize my websites. Between the day job, sculpting, website upgrades and fixes and trying to write a letter in response to the oil drilling proposed in the vicinity of The Spiral Jetty, I probably won’t be blogging to much in the next few days.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On February 7, 2008
At 7:56 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

Julianna’s blog, now with CAPTCHA!

Although no one else can see it because comments are moderated on this blog, there has been a spike in comment spam in the past few days. If I were less cynical, I would be happy for the indication that my blog is slowly gaining visibility. But because that’s not the case, and because I’m tired of deleting Brenda’s “comments” linking to that website selling something or other, I have added a CAPTCHA module for the comments and activated Akismet.

To date, the only comments which have been deleted are those which are obviously spam. Thanks to everyone for maintaining their civility in this crazy, internet world of ours.

No tag for this post.

Related posts

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On January 13, 2008
At 9:12 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post

 
 
 

John Degen responds to copyright articles

Filed under : Uncategorized
By Julianna Yau
On January 10, 2008
At 5:10 pm
Comments : 0
Print This Post Print This Post